Why I Don’t Use “People of Color” / “BIPOC”

Amalgamation is erasure.

Pamela Denise Long
2 min readFeb 20, 2023


Precision is Critical to Analysis & Effective Implementation

I don’t use the term “people of color” nor “BIPOC;” and you shouldn’t either.

I don’t use “BIPOC” nor “people of color” because once it’s uttered, it erases the truth about extent of harms and history of a people/place.

These amalgamations of unrelated peoples compromise the accuracy of the ways people contributed to America. Amalgamated terms interfere with the preciseness of whom we are talking about. “BIPOC/POC” language distorts the accuracy of to whom equity/redress and unique citizenship protections are due.

For example, the Mexicans who chose to become American citizens after the Mexican-American war are NOT the same as Mexicans who travel to America today. Nor are they the same as U.S. chattel slaves. Nor are Afghans the same as American Negroes.

Amalgamation (POCism) is erasure and confusion.

Stop 🛑 causing confusion.

Fix your language.

Call groups EXACTLY what they are in relation to their country of origin, immigration status, race & ethnicity.

Like what you read? Give it a clap or 50. Share this story within your network. Contribute to the discussion.

Pamela Denise Long is a 7th generation American, award winning business consultant for implementing trauma-informed diversity, equity, inclusion, and antiracism, a contributor at Newsweek and political commentator featured on FOXNews, HillTV, Real Clear Politics, The Grio Politics, and more. Connect with Denise @PDeniseLong on Twitter.



Pamela Denise Long

Justice happens through you. -Denise Opinions Mine. All Posts Copyright 2023 Pamela Denise Long. All rights reserved. Twitter: @PDeniseLong